The Exciting Frontier of NFT RWA Hybrid Investment – Gold Rush Fast
Introduction to NFT RWA Hybrid Investment
Welcome to the dynamic frontier of NFT RWA Hybrid Investment, where the realms of digital and real-world assets converge in a gold rush that's fast and fascinating. This burgeoning sector combines the best of both worlds, leveraging blockchain technology to unlock new possibilities and opportunities in the investment landscape. Let’s dive into what makes this fusion so exciting and why it’s capturing the imagination of investors worldwide.
Understanding the Basics
NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) have revolutionized the digital asset space by providing unique ownership and authenticity for digital items. Think of them as digital certificates of authenticity and ownership for anything from art to music to virtual real estate. But NFTs alone aren’t enough for a complete financial revolution. Enter RWA (Real World Assets), which includes tangible, physical assets like real estate, commodities, and even intellectual property. The marriage of NFTs and RWAs in hybrid investments creates a powerful new asset class.
The Mechanics of Hybrid Investments
When NFTs and RWAs combine, they create hybrid assets that bridge the digital and physical worlds. For instance, a piece of real estate could be tokenized through blockchain technology, with an NFT representing ownership and fractional shares available to investors. This not only democratizes access to high-value assets but also introduces new levels of transparency, security, and liquidity.
The magic happens in the smart contracts that automate and enforce the terms of ownership and transfer. These contracts ensure that when a hybrid asset is sold or transferred, all parties receive their rightful shares, and any associated royalties or dividends are automatically distributed. This level of automation reduces the need for intermediaries, lowering fees and increasing efficiency.
Why This Is a Game Changer
The potential of NFT RWA Hybrid Investments lies in their ability to revolutionize traditional asset management. Here’s why this is such a big deal:
Accessibility: Hybrid assets break down barriers to entry for high-value investments. Small investors can now own fractions of expensive assets like real estate, fine art, or even rare commodities.
Liquidity: Traditional RWAs often suffer from illiquidity, meaning it’s hard to sell them quickly without significant loss. NFTs add liquidity by allowing fractional ownership and easier transferability.
Transparency: Blockchain’s inherent transparency means all transactions are recorded on a public ledger, reducing fraud and disputes.
Innovation: The fusion of digital and physical assets spurs innovation in asset management, creating new products and services that appeal to tech-savvy investors.
Case Studies
To understand the real-world applications, let’s look at some successful examples:
Decentralized Real Estate: Platforms like Propy have started tokenizing real estate properties, allowing investors to buy fractional shares of commercial properties. This democratizes real estate investment, making it accessible to a broader audience.
Collectibles and Art: Companies like Foundation are creating NFTs backed by physical art pieces. Collectors can buy NFTs that represent ownership of real-world artworks, while the physical pieces remain in the collectors’ possession.
Commodities and Natural Resources: Projects like Rare Pepe are tokenizing physical commodities like gold and rare minerals, offering investors ownership stakes in these valuable resources.
The Future of Hybrid Investments
The future of NFT RWA Hybrid Investments looks incredibly bright. As blockchain technology matures, we can expect even more sophisticated and diverse hybrid assets. Innovations in decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible token marketplaces will continue to drive growth.
Regulatory frameworks are also evolving to accommodate these new asset classes. Governments and financial institutions are beginning to recognize the potential of hybrid investments and are working to create clear, fair, and innovative regulatory environments.
Conclusion of Part 1
NFT RWA Hybrid Investments represent a revolutionary shift in how we think about and invest in assets. By merging the digital and physical worlds, they offer unprecedented opportunities for accessibility, liquidity, and innovation. As we continue to explore this exciting frontier, the possibilities are as vast as they are promising. Stay tuned for part two, where we’ll delve deeper into the specific strategies and opportunities available in this dynamic field.
Advanced Strategies for NFT RWA Hybrid Investment
In the second part of our exploration into NFT RWA Hybrid Investment, we’ll uncover advanced strategies and opportunities that savvy investors can leverage to maximize their returns. This section will cover specific investment approaches, platforms to watch, and emerging trends shaping the future of hybrid investments.
Strategic Approaches
Due Diligence
Before diving into any hybrid investment, thorough due diligence is crucial. This involves understanding the underlying real-world asset, the technology behind the NFT, and the credibility of the platform offering the hybrid asset. Here’s what to look for:
Asset Underlying Value: Ensure the real-world asset has intrinsic value and potential for appreciation. Blockchain Technology: Investigate the blockchain platform’s reliability, scalability, and security. Platform Reputation: Research the platform’s track record, user reviews, and partnerships with reputable entities.
Fractional Ownership
One of the most compelling aspects of NFT RWA Hybrid Investments is fractional ownership. This allows investors to buy small portions of high-value assets, democratizing access and reducing entry barriers. Here’s how to make the most of it:
Diversification: Spread investments across multiple hybrid assets to mitigate risks. Long-Term Holding: Many hybrid investments offer long-term appreciation potential, making them suitable for buy-and-hold strategies.
Smart Contract Audits
Smart contracts automate the terms of hybrid asset transactions, but they also need to be thoroughly vetted for security vulnerabilities. Use professional services to audit smart contracts before investing. This step ensures the integrity and safety of your investment.
Platforms to Watch
Several platforms are at the forefront of NFT RWA Hybrid Investments. Here are some to keep an eye on:
OpenSea: While primarily known for NFTs, OpenSea has started exploring hybrid assets. It’s a robust marketplace with a strong user base and innovative features.
Rarible: Another leading NFT marketplace, Rarible is experimenting with hybrid assets, offering a diverse range of digital and physical items.
Propy: As mentioned earlier, Propy is a pioneer in tokenizing real estate. Its platform offers fractional ownership of commercial properties, making it a top choice for real estate investors.
Foundation: This platform focuses on art and collectibles, offering NFTs backed by physical artworks. It’s an excellent option for art collectors and investors.
Emerging Trends
The landscape of NFT RWA Hybrid Investments is rapidly evolving, with several trends shaping its future:
Regulatory Developments
Governments and regulatory bodies are beginning to establish clear guidelines for hybrid investments. Staying informed about regulatory changes is crucial for compliance and to take advantage of new opportunities as they arise.
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Integration
DeFi is set to play a significant role in the evolution of hybrid investments. By integrating DeFi protocols, hybrid assets can offer additional financial products like lending, borrowing, and yield farming, enhancing their appeal.
Sustainability and ESG
With growing emphasis on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria, hybrid investments that align with sustainable practices are becoming more attractive. Investors are increasingly looking for opportunities that not only offer financial returns but also contribute positively to the world.
Cross-Asset Integration
The future of hybrid investments lies in the integration of multiple asset classes. Expect to see developments where NFTs represent ownership in a portfolio of diverse assets, including stocks, bonds, and commodities.
Advanced Investment Strategies
For seasoned investors looking to deepen their involvement in NFT RWA Hybrid Investments, here are some advanced strategies:
Yield Farming and Liquidity Pools
Similar to traditional DeFi, yield farming in hybrid investment platforms can offer attractive returns. By providing liquidity to hybrid asset pools, investors can earn fees and rewards.
Leveraged Investments
Leveraged investments in hybrid assets can amplify returns but come with higher risks. Use leverage cautiously and only after thorough analysis and risk assessment.
Arbitrage Opportunities
Hybrid assets can sometimes have price discrepancies across different platforms. Arbitrage opportunities can arise where investors buy low on one platform and sell high on another, capitalizing on price differences.
Conclusion
NFT RWA Hybrid Investments represent a thrilling new frontier in the world of finance, blending the best of digital and real-world assets to create exciting new opportunities. By employing advanced strategies, staying informed about emerging trends, and utilizing reputable platforms, investors can navigate this dynamic landscape effectively.
As the technology and regulatory environment continue to evolve, the potential for NFT RWA Hybrid Investments remains boundless. Whether you’re a novice or a seasoned investor, the opportunities in this space are too promising to ignore.
Stay ahead of the curve, keep learning, and embrace the future of hybrid investments with confidence and curiosity. The gold rush is on, and the treasure lies in the fusion of the digital and physical worlds.
Bitcoin vs. USDT – Which is Safer?
In the ever-evolving landscape of digital currencies, Bitcoin and Tether (USDT) have emerged as two of the most prominent players. Bitcoin, often referred to as digital gold, and USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, have captured the imagination of investors and traders alike. But when it comes to the question of safety, how do these two stack up against each other?
The Nature of Bitcoin
Bitcoin was the first-ever cryptocurrency, introduced in 2009 by an anonymous entity known as Satoshi Nakamoto. It operates on a decentralized network called blockchain, which is a distributed ledger that records all transactions across a network of computers. This decentralized nature is Bitcoin's primary allure, but it also poses unique challenges.
Bitcoin's security is largely rooted in its cryptographic principles and the consensus mechanism known as proof-of-work. Miners solve complex mathematical puzzles to validate transactions and add them to the blockchain, which requires significant computational power. This process not only ensures the integrity of the blockchain but also makes it incredibly resistant to tampering and fraud.
However, Bitcoin's decentralized nature means that it's inherently vulnerable to certain risks. For example, if a majority of the network's nodes were to be compromised, it could potentially lead to a 51% attack, although this is an extreme and highly improbable scenario. Furthermore, the volatility of Bitcoin's value means that its perceived safety can fluctuate dramatically based on market conditions.
The Nature of USDT
Tether (USDT) is a stablecoin, which means its value is intentionally kept stable by being pegged to a fiat currency, in this case, the US dollar. Unlike Bitcoin, USDT operates on a centralized model. It was launched by Tether Limited in 2014 and has since become one of the most widely used stablecoins in the cryptocurrency market.
USDT's stability is its biggest selling point, but it also comes with its own set of risks. Since USDT is pegged to the US dollar, its value should remain constant, making it an attractive option for traders looking to avoid the volatility of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. However, the centralization of USDT's operations means it's vulnerable to risks associated with centralized systems, such as regulatory scrutiny and potential fraud.
One of the major concerns with USDT is the transparency of its reserves. While Tether Limited claims that it holds reserves of US dollars and other assets to back the USDT in circulation, skepticism about the transparency and verification of these reserves has led to controversies. In 2018, Tether faced scrutiny from regulators and investors, raising questions about its true backing and overall safety.
Comparative Security Analysis
When comparing the safety of Bitcoin and USDT, it's essential to consider various factors, including regulatory compliance, security measures, and market perception.
Regulatory Compliance
Bitcoin, as a decentralized cryptocurrency, operates largely outside the purview of traditional financial regulations. This lack of regulation can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it offers users a level of freedom and autonomy. On the other hand, it means that Bitcoin is subject to the inherent risks of the unregulated market. The lack of oversight can lead to instances of fraud and scams, although the decentralized nature of Bitcoin also means that it's harder for a single entity to manipulate the entire market.
USDT, on the other hand, is subject to more regulatory scrutiny. While this can provide an additional layer of security, it also means that USDT is more susceptible to changes in regulations that could impact its use and value. Moreover, Tether Limited has faced regulatory investigations and scrutiny, which have raised questions about its compliance and transparency.
Security Measures
Bitcoin's security is primarily rooted in its cryptographic principles and the proof-of-work consensus mechanism. The decentralized nature of the network makes it incredibly resistant to attacks, although it's not entirely immune. The security of Bitcoin's blockchain is bolstered by the collective computational power of its network, making it difficult for any single entity to compromise the entire system.
USDT, in contrast, relies on the security measures implemented by Tether Limited. While this centralization can provide a level of oversight and control, it also means that USDT is vulnerable to breaches and fraud. The lack of transparency around Tether's reserves has led to concerns about its security and reliability.
Market Perception
The market perception of Bitcoin and USDT is shaped by their unique attributes and the narratives surrounding them. Bitcoin's perceived safety is often tied to its status as a store of value and its potential to hedge against inflation. However, its volatility can make it a risky investment for some.
USDT's safety is primarily tied to its stability. Traders and investors view USDT as a reliable means to avoid the volatility of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. However, the controversies surrounding Tether Limited and the lack of transparency around its reserves have led to skepticism about its true safety.
Conclusion
In the ongoing debate about Bitcoin vs. USDT safety, it's clear that both have their unique strengths and weaknesses. Bitcoin's decentralized nature and cryptographic security offer a level of autonomy and resistance to tampering, but it's also subject to market volatility and regulatory risks. USDT's stability and centralization provide a level of control and oversight, but they also come with concerns about transparency and regulatory compliance.
Ultimately, the choice between Bitcoin and USDT depends on individual preferences, investment goals, and risk tolerance. Both have their place in the world of digital currencies, and understanding their respective safety profiles can help investors make informed decisions about where to allocate their resources. In the next part, we'll delve deeper into the practical implications of using Bitcoin and USDT for trading, investing, and everyday transactions.
Bitcoin vs. USDT – Which is Safer?
In the ongoing debate about Bitcoin vs. USDT safety, it's essential to consider the practical implications of using these two digital assets for trading, investing, and everyday transactions. In this part, we'll explore how Bitcoin and USDT differ in terms of usability, transaction speed, fees, and their integration into the broader financial ecosystem.
Usability
When it comes to usability, Bitcoin and USDT cater to different needs and use cases.
Bitcoin is often used as a store of value or a long-term investment. Its decentralized nature and cryptographic security make it a compelling option for those looking to hedge against inflation or economic instability. However, Bitcoin's volatility can make it less suitable for everyday transactions due to the risk of price fluctuations.
USDT, on the other hand, is designed for stability and usability. Its peg to the US dollar makes it an attractive option for traders looking to avoid the volatility of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. USDT's stability also makes it a practical choice for everyday transactions, allowing users to buy and sell goods and services without worrying about the fluctuations in Bitcoin's value.
Transaction Speed
The speed of transactions is another critical factor in the safety and usability of Bitcoin and USDT.
Bitcoin transactions are processed through a decentralized network, which means that the speed and confirmation time can vary. During periods of high network congestion, Bitcoin transactions can take several hours to confirm, which can be inconvenient for time-sensitive transactions. Additionally, Bitcoin's transaction fees can spike during periods of high demand, making it less attractive for frequent transactions.
USDT transactions, on the other hand, are processed through a centralized network, which typically offers faster transaction speeds and confirmation times. The speed of USDT transactions is generally more predictable, making it a practical choice for both traders and everyday users.
Fees
Fees play a significant role in the overall safety and usability of Bitcoin and USDT.
Bitcoin's transaction fees are influenced by network congestion and can vary widely. During periods of high demand, Bitcoin transaction fees can be quite high, which can make it less attractive for frequent or small-value transactions. However, during periods of low demand, Bitcoin transaction fees can be relatively low, making it a cost-effective option for larger transactions.
USDT, in contrast, typically offers lower transaction fees due to its centralized nature. The fees associated with USDT transactions are generally more predictable and can be lower than those associated with Bitcoin transactions. This makes USDT a more cost-effective option for frequent or small-value transactions.
Integration into the Financial Ecosystem
The integration of Bitcoin and USDT into the broader financial ecosystem is another important aspect to consider when evaluating their safety and usability.
Bitcoin has seen significant integration into the financial system, with increasing numbers of merchants accepting it as a form of payment. Bitcoin's decentralized nature and cryptographic security have also led to its adoption by institutional investors and financial institutions.
USDT, on the other hand, has seen widespread adoption in the cryptocurrency market, particularly among traders and exchanges. Its stability and peg to the US dollar make it an attractive option for traders looking to avoid the volatility of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. USDT is also increasingly being integrated into traditional financial systems, with more payment processors and financial institutions accepting it as a form of payment.
Conclusion
Bitcoin vs. USDT – Which is Safer?
In the ever-evolving landscape of digital currencies, Bitcoin and Tether (USDT) have emerged as two of the most prominent players. Bitcoin, often referred to as digital gold, and USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, have captured the imagination of investors and traders alike. But when it comes to the question of safety, how do these two stack up against each other?
The Nature of Bitcoin
Bitcoin was the first-ever cryptocurrency, introduced in 2009 by an anonymous entity known as Satoshi Nakamoto. It operates on a decentralized network called blockchain, which is a distributed ledger that records all transactions across a network of computers. This decentralized nature is Bitcoin's primary allure, but it also poses unique challenges.
Bitcoin's security is largely rooted in its cryptographic principles and the consensus mechanism known as proof-of-work. Miners solve complex mathematical puzzles to validate transactions and add them to the blockchain, which requires significant computational power. This process not only ensures the integrity of the blockchain but also makes it incredibly resistant to tampering and fraud.
However, Bitcoin's decentralized nature means that it's inherently vulnerable to certain risks. For example, if a majority of the network's nodes were to be compromised, it could potentially lead to a 51% attack, although this is an extreme and highly improbable scenario. Furthermore, the volatility of Bitcoin's value means that its perceived safety can fluctuate dramatically based on market conditions.
The Nature of USDT
Tether (USDT) is a stablecoin, which means its value is intentionally kept stable by being pegged to a fiat currency, in this case, the US dollar. Unlike Bitcoin, USDT operates on a centralized model. It was launched by Tether Limited in 2014 and has since become one of the most widely used stablecoins in the cryptocurrency market.
USDT's stability is its biggest selling point, but it also comes with its own set of risks. Since USDT is pegged to the US dollar, its value should remain constant, making it an attractive option for traders looking to avoid the volatility of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. However, the centralization of USDT's operations means it's vulnerable to risks associated with centralized systems, such as regulatory scrutiny and potential fraud.
One of the major concerns with USDT is the transparency of its reserves. While Tether Limited claims that it holds reserves of US dollars and other assets to back the USDT in circulation, skepticism about the transparency and verification of these reserves has led to controversies. In 2018, Tether faced scrutiny from regulators and investors, raising questions about its true backing and overall safety.
Comparative Security Analysis
When comparing the safety of Bitcoin and USDT, it's essential to consider various factors, including regulatory compliance, security measures, and market perception.
Regulatory Compliance
Bitcoin, as a decentralized cryptocurrency, operates largely outside the purview of traditional financial regulations. This lack of regulation can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it offers users a level of freedom and autonomy. On the other hand, it means that Bitcoin is subject to the inherent risks of the unregulated market. The lack of oversight can lead to instances of fraud and scams, although the decentralized nature of Bitcoin also means that it's harder for a single entity to manipulate the entire market.
USDT, on the other hand, is subject to more regulatory scrutiny. While this can provide an additional layer of security, it also means that USDT is more susceptible to changes in regulations that could impact its use and value. Moreover, Tether Limited has faced regulatory investigations and scrutiny, which have raised questions about its compliance and transparency.
Security Measures
Bitcoin's security is primarily rooted in its cryptographic principles and the proof-of-work consensus mechanism. The decentralized nature of the network makes it incredibly resistant to attacks, although it's not entirely immune. The security of Bitcoin's blockchain is bolstered by the collective computational power of its network, making it difficult for any single entity to compromise the entire system.
USDT, in contrast, relies on the security measures implemented by Tether Limited. While this centralization can provide a level of oversight and control, it also means that USDT is vulnerable to breaches and fraud. The lack of transparency around Tether's reserves has led to concerns about its security and reliability.
Market Perception
The market perception of Bitcoin and USDT is shaped by their unique attributes and the narratives surrounding them. Bitcoin's perceived safety is often tied to its status as a store of value and its potential to hedge against inflation. However, its volatility can make it a risky investment for some.
USDT's safety is primarily tied to its stability. Traders and investors view USDT as a reliable means to avoid the volatility of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. However, the controversies surrounding Tether Limited and the lack of transparency around its reserves have led to skepticism about its true safety.
Conclusion
In the ongoing debate about Bitcoin vs. USDT safety, it's clear that both have their unique strengths and weaknesses. Bitcoin's decentralized nature and cryptographic security offer a level of autonomy and resistance to tampering, but it's also subject to market volatility and regulatory risks. USDT's stability and centralization provide a level of control and oversight, but they also come with concerns about transparency and regulatory compliance.
Ultimately, the choice between Bitcoin and USDT depends on individual preferences, investment goals, and risk tolerance. Both have their place in the world of digital currencies, and understanding their respective safety profiles can help investors make informed decisions about where to allocate their resources. In the next part, we'll delve deeper into the practical implications of using Bitcoin and USDT for trading, investing, and everyday transactions.
Bitcoin vs. USDT – Which is Safer?
In the ongoing debate about Bitcoin vs. USDT safety, it's essential to consider the practical implications of using these two digital assets for trading, investing, and everyday transactions. In this part, we'll explore how Bitcoin and USDT differ in terms of usability, transaction speed, fees, and their integration into the broader financial ecosystem.
Usability
When it comes to usability, Bitcoin and USDT cater to different needs and use cases.
Bitcoin is often used as a store of value or a long-term investment. Its decentralized nature and cryptographic security make it a compelling option for those looking to hedge against inflation or economic instability. However, Bitcoin's volatility can make it less suitable for everyday transactions due to the risk of price fluctuations.
USDT, on the other hand, is designed for stability and usability. Its peg to the US dollar makes it an attractive option for traders looking to avoid the volatility of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. USDT's stability also makes it a practical choice for everyday transactions, allowing users to buy and sell goods and services without worrying about the fluctuations in Bitcoin's value.
Transaction Speed
The speed of transactions is another critical factor in the safety and usability of Bitcoin and USDT.
Bitcoin transactions are processed through a decentralized network, which means that the speed and confirmation time can vary. During periods of high network congestion, Bitcoin transactions can take several hours to confirm, which can be inconvenient for time-sensitive transactions. Additionally, Bitcoin's transaction fees can spike during periods of high demand, making it less attractive for frequent transactions.
USDT transactions, on the other hand, are processed through a centralized network, which typically offers faster transaction speeds and confirmation times. The speed of USDT transactions is generally more predictable, making it a practical choice for both traders and everyday users.
Fees
Fees play a significant role in the overall safety and usability of Bitcoin and USDT.
Bitcoin's transaction fees are influenced by network congestion and can vary widely. During periods of high demand, Bitcoin transaction fees can be quite high, which can make it less attractive for frequent or small-value transactions. However, during periods of low demand, Bitcoin transaction fees can be relatively low, making it a cost-effective option for larger transactions.
USDT, in contrast, typically offers lower transaction fees due to its centralized nature. The fees associated with USDT transactions are generally more predictable and can be lower than those associated with Bitcoin transactions. This makes USDT a more cost-effective option for frequent or small-value transactions.
Integration into the Financial Ecosystem
The integration of Bitcoin and USDT into the broader financial ecosystem is another important aspect to consider when evaluating their safety and usability.
Bitcoin has seen significant integration into the financial system, with increasing numbers of merchants accepting it as a form of payment. Bitcoin's decentralized nature and cryptographic security have also led to its adoption by institutional investors and financial institutions.
USDT, on the other hand, has seen widespread adoption in the cryptocurrency market, particularly among traders and exchanges. Its stability and peg to the US dollar make it an attractive option for traders looking to avoid the volatility of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. USDT is also increasingly being integrated into traditional financial systems, with more payment processors and financial institutions accepting it as a form of payment.
Conclusion
In the ongoing debate about Bitcoin vs. USDT safety, it's clear that both have their unique特点和应用场景，因此在选择哪种更安全时，应该根据具体的使用需求来决定。
对于长期投资和作为数字黄金的角度，许多人认为比特币的去中心化和加密技术提供了一种高度安全的数字资产。由于其价格波动剧烈，它并不适合作为日常支付手段。
而Tether（USDT）则因其稳定的价值（理论上与美元一致）和较低的交易费用，更适合于频繁交易和日常支付。尽管其安全性一直受到一些争议，特别是在涉及到其资产支持和透明度方面，但其在市场上的广泛接受度和监管机构的关注度使其在某些情况下仍然具有吸引力。
比特币和Tether的“安全性”并不是单一维度的评判，而是多维度综合考量，包括但不限于去中心化程度、交易速度、交易费用、市场接受度以及监管环境。每个人或企业应根据自己的风险承受能力、投资目标和使用场景来选择合适的数字资产。在任何情况下，都应进行充分的研究和风险评估，确保在使用这些数字资产时能够最大程度地保护自己的资产安全。
值得注意的是，无论选择哪种数字资产，都应采取适当的安全措施，例如使用强密码、启用双重认证、以及存储大部分资产在安全的冷存储设备中，以防止潜在的黑客攻击和欺诈行为。
One-Click Crypto No Gas Fees_ Revolutionizing Your Digital Finances
Unlock Your Earning Potential Innovative Blockchain Side Hustle Ideas for the Modern Era